Syringe.Net.Nz
Irregular Injection of Opinion
RSS 2.0|Atom 1.0|CDF

 Thursday, March 13, 2008
Who Is Telling Porkies?
The Software Freedom Law Center have posted a Resource on the Microsoft Open Specificaton Promise.

It states, among other things:

"There has been much discussion in the free software community and in the press about the inadequacy of Microsoft's Office Open XML (OOXML) as a standard, including good analysis of some of the shortcomings of Microsoft's Open Specification Promise (OSP), a promise that is supposed to protect projects from patent risk. Nonetheless, following the close of the ISO-BRM meeting in Geneva, SFLC's clients and colleagues have continued to express uncertainty as to whether the OSP would adequately apply to implementations licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL). In response to these requests for clarification, we publicly conclude that the OSP provides no assurance to GPL developers and that it is unsafe to rely upon the OSP for any free software implementation, whether under the GPL or another free software license."

Lawrence Rosen says it's compatible with free and open source licenses. So do number of other prominent OSS legal minds.

The OSP has actually been around for a decent length of time. For those who aren't aware it's the approach taken to cover the IPR in relation to the Web Services specifications work MSFT is involved in with OASIS (Yes OASIS as in manages ODF). So for example Apache has implemented SOAP- released under the Apace open source license. THe guys from Sugar CRM have also succesfully released their SOAP based web services under GPL v3.

So either Rosen is wrong and Apache/SugarCRM are risking IP breach, or, someone is telling porkies.

Maybe Larry and Larry (Lessig, one of the Directors of the SFLC) could get together for a bit of a chat (the are former collegues @ Stanford Law) and work out who is right, or who is wrong, or why we seem to have two TOTALLY disparate answers out there?




PoliTechLaw|Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:56:00 AM UTC|Comments [0]|    
Comments are closed.